Provenance & authority
Who created it? Who owns it? What employment, customer or third-party agreements govern it? Possession is not licensing authority.
Explore whether original business materials could support AI training or evaluation—without treating your information as a commodity.
Original training materials, operational procedures, technical workflows and authorized structured activity may contain domain-specific knowledge useful beyond their original purpose.
We begin by considering what the material represents, its source, how it was created and whether it matches a potential buyer’s intended use. Not every material is suitable or eligible.
Who created it? Who owns it? What employment, customer or third-party agreements govern it? Possession is not licensing authority.
Is the material coherent, documented and useful for the proposed domain? What gaps, duplication or unsupported assumptions exist?
Describe formats, approximate scale and time coverage. These remain subject to inventory and qualification.
Identify privacy obligations, confidentiality, IP rights and contractual restrictions. “Unsure” is a valid starting point.
Licensing scope, term, permitted uses and exclusivity are negotiated for each opportunity. You may retain ownership, depending on the agreed structure.
Commercial assessment is not a formal appraisal or legal advice. Eligibility, buyer interest, valuation and payment are not guaranteed. Fees, representation and conflicts are governed by separate engagement terms.
View Illustrative Opportunity BriefBegin with categories and metadata. No obligation, no raw data, and no guaranteed outcome.